Bill Bulick here, inviting you to weigh in…
Input received from focus groups, interviews and community meetings so far has reflected two strong currents of thinking – that Austin must be careful to provide support – “habitat” - for individual artists and creators – and that it is critical that the community do a better job in sustaining its major cultural institutions. Which is more important? Can we do both? What does a cultural infrastructure look like that can accomplish both? How could institutions and individual creators work more productively together?
Comments